FX-8350 vs i7-3960X Extreme Edition
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition outperforms FX-8350 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1142 | 1475 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.77 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7EE | AMD FX-Series (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 4.07 | 2.83 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (13 years ago) | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 33 | no data |
| L2 cache | 1,536 KB | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 434.72 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2270 Million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-8350 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-8350.
| PCIe version | 2.00 | n/a |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.70 | 3.81 |
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 23 October 2012 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 125 Watt |
i7-3960X Extreme Edition has a 49.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more threads.
FX-8350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, 33.3% more physical cores, and 4% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
