FX-6200 vs i7-3960X Extreme Edition
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition outperforms FX-6200 by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1141 | 1726 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7EE | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.07 | 1.95 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (13 years ago) | 27 February 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 33 | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | 1,536 KB | 6144 KB |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | 8192 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 434.72 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2270 Million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-6200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-6200.
| PCIe version | 2.00 | n/a |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.61 | 2.58 |
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 27 February 2012 |
| Threads | 12 | 6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 125 Watt |
i7-3960X Extreme Edition has a 117.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.
FX-6200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 4% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and FX-6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
