Ryzen 5 1400 vs i7-3770K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3770K
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 77 Watt
4.08
Ryzen 5 1400
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
4.88
+19.6%

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Core i7-3770K by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3770K and Ryzen 5 1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14121247
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.722.63
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency5.017.11
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)11 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294$169

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 1400 has 265% better value for money than i7-3770K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3770K and Ryzen 5 1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMIno data
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3532
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3770K and Ryzen 5 1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155AM4
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770K and Ryzen 5 1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3770K and Ryzen 5 1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770K and Ryzen 5 1400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770K and Ryzen 5 1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770K and Ryzen 5 1400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770K and Ryzen 5 1400.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3770K 4.08
Ryzen 5 1400 4.88
+19.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3770K 6473
Ryzen 5 1400 7750
+19.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-3770K 713
Ryzen 5 1400 962
+34.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-3770K 2498
Ryzen 5 1400 3131
+25.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-3770K 5536
+31.7%
Ryzen 5 1400 4205

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-3770K 22190
+26.4%
Ryzen 5 1400 17557

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-3770K 7229
+12.3%
Ryzen 5 1400 6437

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-3770K 6.39
+22.1%
Ryzen 5 1400 7.8

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-3770K 8
Ryzen 5 1400 8
+1%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i7-3770K 1.65
+7.8%
Ryzen 5 1400 1.53

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-3770K 3.9
Ryzen 5 1400 4.1
+5.1%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i7-3770K 3698
+34.1%
Ryzen 5 1400 2758

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i7-3770K 43
+0.9%
Ryzen 5 1400 43

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i7-3770K 172
+17.3%
Ryzen 5 1400 147

Geekbench 2

i7-3770K 12435
+18.3%
Ryzen 5 1400 10513

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.08 4.88
Recency 29 April 2012 11 April 2017
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 1400 has a 19.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 18.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 1400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3770K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770K and Ryzen 5 1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770K
Core i7-3770K
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Ryzen 5 1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2720 votes

Rate Core i7-3770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 764 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3770K or Ryzen 5 1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.