i5-480M vs i7-3770K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3770K
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 77 Watt
4.23
+386%

Core i7-3770K outperforms Core i5-480M by a whopping 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3770K and Core i5-480M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13912571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.66no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Core i5
Power efficiency5.012.27
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)11 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294$81

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3770K and Core i5-480M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.93 GHz
Bus typeDMIDMI 1.0
Bus rate5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier3520
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors0 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3770K and Core i5-480M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770K and Core i5-480M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-3770K and Core i5-480M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770K and Core i5-480M are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770K and Core i5-480M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz766 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770K and Core i5-480M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770K and Core i5-480M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3770K 4.23
+386%
i5-480M 0.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3770K 6466
+388%
i5-480M 1324

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-3770K 712
+96.7%
i5-480M 362

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-3770K 2497
+267%
i5-480M 681

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-3770K 5536
+73.5%
i5-480M 3191

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-3770K 22190
+213%
i5-480M 7080

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-3770K 7229
+145%
i5-480M 2954

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-3770K 6.39
+181%
i5-480M 17.95

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-3770K 8
+233%
i5-480M 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.23 0.87
Recency 29 April 2012 11 January 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 35 Watt

i7-3770K has a 386.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

i5-480M, on the other hand, has 120% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3770K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-480M in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-3770K is a desktop processor while Core i5-480M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770K and Core i5-480M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770K
Core i7-3770K
Intel Core i5-480M
Core i5-480M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2605 votes

Rate Core i7-3770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 255 votes

Rate Core i5-480M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3770K or Core i5-480M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.