Xeon X5698 vs i7-3770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3770
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 77 Watt
4.05
+85.8%
Xeon X5698
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.18

Core i7-3770 outperforms Xeon X5698 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3770 and Xeon X5698 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14051842
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.61no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency4.961.58
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3770 and Xeon X5698 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.4 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12288 KB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3770 and Xeon X5698 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA11551366
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770 and Xeon X5698. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3770 and Xeon X5698 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770 and Xeon X5698 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770 and Xeon X5698. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770 and Xeon X5698 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770 and Xeon X5698.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3770 4.05
+85.8%
Xeon X5698 2.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3770 6413
+86%
Xeon X5698 3447

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.05 2.18
Recency 29 April 2012 14 February 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 130 Watt

i7-3770 has a 85.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 68.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5698 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-3770 is a desktop processor while Xeon X5698 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770 and Xeon X5698, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770
Core i7-3770
Intel Xeon X5698
Xeon X5698

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7112 votes

Rate Core i7-3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Xeon X5698 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3770 or Xeon X5698, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.