A10-4655M vs i7-3689Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3689Y
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
1.26
+18.9%
A10-4655M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.06

Core i7-3689Y outperforms A10-4655M by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3689Y and A10-4655M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23012425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD A-Series
Power efficiency9.003.94
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date8 January 2013 (11 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3689Y and A10-4655M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size118 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3689Y and A10-4655M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FP2
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3689Y and A10-4655M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3689Y and A10-4655M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3689Y and A10-4655M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3689Y and A10-4655M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3unknown Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000AMD Radeon HD 7620G
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3689Y and A10-4655M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3689Y 1.26
+18.9%
A10-4655M 1.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3689Y 1967
+18.6%
A10-4655M 1658

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 1.06
Integrated graphics card 1.18 0.94
Recency 8 January 2013 15 May 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 25 Watt

i7-3689Y has a 18.9% higher aggregate performance score, 25.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 months, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

A10-4655M, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Core i7-3689Y is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-4655M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3689Y and A10-4655M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3689Y
Core i7-3689Y
AMD A10-4655M
A10-4655M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-3689Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 64 votes

Rate A10-4655M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3689Y or A10-4655M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.