Turion II M520 vs i7-3687U

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3687U
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.70
+198%
Turion II M520
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.57

Core i7-3687U outperforms Turion II M520 by a whopping 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3687U and Turion II M520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20592824
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Turion II
Power efficiency9.291.51
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Caspian (2009)
Release date8 January 2013 (11 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3687U and Turion II M520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s3600 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3687U and Turion II M520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1023Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3687U and Turion II M520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3687U and Turion II M520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3687U and Turion II M520 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3687U and Turion II M520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3687U and Turion II M520 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3687U and Turion II M520.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.70 0.57
Recency 8 January 2013 10 September 2009
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

i7-3687U has a 198.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3687U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II M520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3687U and Turion II M520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3687U
Core i7-3687U
AMD Turion II M520
Turion II M520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 37 votes

Rate Core i7-3687U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 91 vote

Rate Turion II M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3687U or Turion II M520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.