Celeron J4125 vs i7-2675QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2675QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.43
+30.6%
Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.86

Core i7-2675QM outperforms Celeron J4125 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17601982
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency5.1117.60
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache64K (per core)56 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm293 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1224FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2675QM 2.43
+30.6%
Celeron J4125 1.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2675QM 3856
+30.4%
Celeron J4125 2956

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2675QM 446
+28.9%
Celeron J4125 346

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2675QM 1412
+46.8%
Celeron J4125 962

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 1.86
Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.87
Recency 12 October 2011 4 November 2019
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 10 Watt

i7-2675QM has a 30.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron J4125, on the other hand, has 31.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2675QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4125 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2675QM is a notebook processor while Celeron J4125 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2675QM and Celeron J4125, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2675QM
Core i7-2675QM
Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate Core i7-2675QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1510 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2675QM or Celeron J4125, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.