Ultra 7 265KF vs i7-2649M

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2649M and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated87
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data98.08
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiencyno data28.13
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2649M and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size149 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors624 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2649M and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA10231851
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2649M and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2649M and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2649M and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2649M and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8.01 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2649M and Core Ultra 7 265KF integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2649M and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2011 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 125 Watt

i7-2649M has 400% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 900% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-2649M and Core Ultra 7 265KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i7-2649M is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2649M and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2649M
Core i7-2649M
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-2649M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 38 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2649M or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.