A9-9400 SoC vs i7-2620M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2129not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency4.14no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date20 February 2011 (13 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128 KB160 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size149 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors624 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988FT4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000Radeon R5 3CU
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 February 2011 31 May 2016
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

i7-2620M has 100% more threads.

A9-9400 SoC, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i7-2620M is a notebook processor while A9-9400 SoC is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2620M
Core i7-2620M
AMD A9-9400 SoC
A9-9400 SoC

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 177 votes

Rate Core i7-2620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 77 votes

Rate A9-9400 SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2620M or A9-9400 SoC, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.