Atom x7425E vs i7-2610UE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2610UE
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.89
Atom x7425E
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
3.46
+289%

Atom x7425E outperforms Core i7-2610UE by a whopping 289% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2610UE and Atom x7425E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25401536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency4.9527.29
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Gracemont (2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2610UE and Atom x7425E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2610UE and Atom x7425E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataIntel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2610UE and Atom x7425E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Core i7-2610UE and Atom x7425E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2610UE and Atom x7425E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2610UE and Atom x7425E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel UHD Graphics 24EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2610UE and Atom x7425E.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2610UE 0.89
Atom x7425E 3.46
+289%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2610UE 1409
Atom x7425E 5502
+290%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 3.46
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 12 Watt

Atom x7425E has a 288.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 41.7% lower power consumption.

The Atom x7425E is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2610UE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2610UE and Atom x7425E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2610UE
Core i7-2610UE
Intel Atom x7425E
Atom x7425E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2610UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom x7425E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2610UE or Atom x7425E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.