Atom x5-E8000 vs i7-2610UE

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2610UE
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.89
+45.9%
Atom x5-E8000
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
0.61

Core i7-2610UE outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2610UE and Atom x5-E8000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25382787
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i75x Intel Atom
Power efficiency4.9311.50
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317$39

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2610UE and Atom x5-E8000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.04 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1510
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2610UE and Atom x5-E8000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2610UE and Atom x5-E8000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Core i7-2610UE and Atom x5-E8000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2610UE and Atom x5-E8000 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2610UE and Atom x5-E8000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel HD Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2610UE and Atom x5-E8000.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2610UE 0.89
+45.9%
Atom x5-E8000 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2610UE 1409
+46.5%
Atom x5-E8000 962

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 0.61
Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.77
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 5 Watt

i7-2610UE has a 45.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom x5-E8000, on the other hand, has 16.7% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 240% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2610UE is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E8000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2610UE and Atom x5-E8000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2610UE
Core i7-2610UE
Intel Atom x5-E8000
Atom x5-E8000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2610UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Atom x5-E8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2610UE or Atom x5-E8000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.