A6-3430MX vs i7-2610UE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2610UE
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.89
A6-3430MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.91
+2.2%

A6-3430MX outperforms Core i7-2610UE by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2610UE and A6-3430MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25402523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD A-Series
Power efficiency4.951.91
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Llano (2011−2012)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2610UE and A6-3430MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache128 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Number of transistors624 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2610UE and A6-3430MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFS1
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2610UE and A6-3430MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2610UE and A6-3430MX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2610UE and A6-3430MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2610UE and A6-3430MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2610UE 0.89
A6-3430MX 0.91
+2.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2610UE 1409
A6-3430MX 1448
+2.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 0.91
Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.78
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 45 Watt

i7-2610UE has 164.7% lower power consumption.

A6-3430MX, on the other hand, has a 2.2% higher aggregate performance score, 18.2% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-2610UE and A6-3430MX.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2610UE and A6-3430MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2610UE
Core i7-2610UE
AMD A6-3430MX
A6-3430MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2610UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 40 votes

Rate A6-3430MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2610UE or A6-3430MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.