Celeron M 360 vs i7-2600

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2600 and Celeron M 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1561not rated
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.48no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency3.35no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$247no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2600 and Celeron M 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2600 and Celeron M 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA1155PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2600 and Celeron M 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-2600 and Celeron M 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2600 and Celeron M 360 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2600 and Celeron M 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2600 and Celeron M 360 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2600 and Celeron M 360.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2600 5343
+2318%
Celeron M 360 221

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 21 Watt

i7-2600 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 360, on the other hand, has 352.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-2600 and Celeron M 360. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-2600 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2600 and Celeron M 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2600
Core i7-2600
Intel Celeron M 360
Celeron M 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2712 votes

Rate Core i7-2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2600 or Celeron M 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.