Core Ultra 5 125U vs Core i7-13800H
Aggregate performance score
i7-13800H outperforms Ultra 5 125U by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-13800H and Core Ultra 5 125U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 347 | 643 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Raptor Lake-H | Intel Meteor Lake-U |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-H | Meteor Lake-P |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-13800H and Core Ultra 5 125U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 1.2 MB | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 11.5 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 110 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-13800H and Core Ultra 5 125U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | Intel BGA 2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13800H and Core Ultra 5 125U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-13800H and Core Ultra 5 125U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13800H and Core Ultra 5 125U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13800H and Core Ultra 5 125U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13800H and Core Ultra 5 125U.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 12 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-13800H outperforms Core Ultra 5 125U by 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-13800H outperforms Core Ultra 5 125U by 51% in Passmark.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core i7-13800H outperforms Core Ultra 5 125U by 66% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Core i7-13800H outperforms Core Ultra 5 125U by 26% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.42 | 11.57 |
| Integrated graphics card | 9.43 | 9.70 |
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 12 |
| Threads | 20 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
i7-13800H has a 50.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 16.7% more physical cores and 42.9% more threads.
Ultra 5 125U, on the other hand, has 2.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 months, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-13800H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 125U in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13800H and Core Ultra 5 125U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
