Xeon E-2478 vs i7-13700KF

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-13700KF
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
29.91
+55.1%

i7-13700KF outperforms Xeon E-2478 by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13700KF and Xeon E-2478 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking147303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.52no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date27 September 2022 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$384no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13700KF and Xeon E-2478 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/s16 GT/s
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache768 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13700KF and Xeon E-2478 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)125 W, 253 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700KF and Xeon E-2478. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
StatusLaunchedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i7-13700KF and Xeon E-2478 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700KF and Xeon E-2478 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700KF and Xeon E-2478. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size192 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700KF and Xeon E-2478.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-13700KF 29.91
+55.1%
Xeon E-2478 19.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-13700KF 46266
+55.1%
Xeon E-2478 29827

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.91 19.28
Recency 27 September 2022 14 December 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 80 Watt

i7-13700KF has a 55.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Xeon E-2478, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 56.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-13700KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2478 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-13700KF is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2478 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13700KF and Xeon E-2478, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13700KF
Core i7-13700KF
Intel Xeon E-2478
Xeon E-2478

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 877 votes

Rate Core i7-13700KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2478 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13700KF or Xeon E-2478, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.