i7-13700 vs i7-13700K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-13700K
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
29.19
+25.9%
Core i7-13700
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
23.19

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core i7-13700 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking150224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.9949.43
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency22.1033.76
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$409$384

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13700K has 29% better value for money than i7-13700.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2424
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache768 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)125 W, 253 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size192 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770Intel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Execution Units3232

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-13700K 29.19
+25.9%
i7-13700 23.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-13700K 46366
+25.9%
i7-13700 36842

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-13700K 2862
+7.8%
i7-13700 2654

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-13700K 17820
+20.9%
i7-13700 14744

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-13700K 11278
+4%
i7-13700 10840

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-13700K 85748
+3.7%
i7-13700 82724

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-13700K 18153
+5.6%
i7-13700 17194

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-13700K 2.31
+8.2%
i7-13700 2.5

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-13700K 53
+5.2%
i7-13700 50

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-13700K 4508
+22.1%
i7-13700 3692

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-13700K 303
+6.3%
i7-13700 285

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i7-13700K 3.66
+4.6%
i7-13700 3.5

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-13700K 15.8
i7-13700 22
+39.2%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i7-13700K 12835
+4.4%
i7-13700 12289

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i7-13700K 232
+3.6%
i7-13700 224

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i7-13700K 406
+3.3%
i7-13700 393

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i7-13700K 20191
+15%
i7-13700 17564

Blender(-)

i7-13700K 108
i7-13700 145
+33.8%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i7-13700K 2110
+6.4%
i7-13700 1984

7-Zip Single

i7-13700K 7062
+6.3%
i7-13700 6643

7-Zip

i7-13700K 111390
+21.6%
i7-13700 91604

WebXPRT 3

i7-13700K 348
+3%
i7-13700 338

CrossMark Overall

i7-13700K 2325
+7.2%
i7-13700 2169

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i7-13700K 301
+4%
i7-13700 290

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i7-13700K 177
i7-13700 251
+41.9%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

i7-13700K 19249
+21.2%
i7-13700 15882

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

i7-13700K 2962
+7.3%
i7-13700 2761

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.19 23.19
Recency 27 September 2022 4 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

i7-13700K has a 25.9% higher aggregate performance score.

i7-13700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-13700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-13700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13700K and Core i7-13700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
Intel Core i7-13700
Core i7-13700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1395 votes

Rate Core i7-13700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 366 votes

Rate Core i7-13700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13700K or Core i7-13700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.