Ryzen 7 8845HS vs i7-13650HX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-13650HX
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 55 Watt
19.77
+9%
Ryzen 7 8845HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
18.14

Core i7-13650HX outperforms Ryzen 7 8845HS by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking289337
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXno data
Power efficiency34.0238.15
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-HX (2023)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$485no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1964FP8
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-13650HX 19.77
+9%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 18.14

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-13650HX 31411
+9%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 28812

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-13650HX 10616
+42%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 7475

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-13650HX 68755
+45%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 47416

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-13650HX 16051
+2.1%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 15724

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-13650HX 37
+26.8%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 30

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-13650HX 3076
+19.6%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 2572

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-13650HX 271
Ryzen 7 8845HS 278
+2.6%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i7-13650HX 3.31
Ryzen 7 8845HS 3.31

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-13650HX 16.7
+17.6%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 14.2

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i7-13650HX 8422
Ryzen 7 8845HS 13168
+56.3%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i7-13650HX 175
+21.9%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 144

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i7-13650HX 346
+19.7%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 289

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i7-13650HX 13730
+16.2%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 11819

Blender(-)

i7-13650HX 165
Ryzen 7 8845HS 200
+21.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i7-13650HX 1845
Ryzen 7 8845HS 1940
+5.1%

7-Zip Single

i7-13650HX 5891
Ryzen 7 8845HS 6305
+7%

7-Zip

i7-13650HX 77020
+14.7%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 67167

WebXPRT 3

i7-13650HX 302
Ryzen 7 8845HS 305
+1%

CrossMark Overall

i7-13650HX 1842
+2.9%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 1790

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i7-13650HX 277
+8.4%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 255

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i7-13650HX 281
Ryzen 7 8845HS 320
+14.1%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

i7-13650HX 13633
+7.2%
Ryzen 7 8845HS 12721

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

i7-13650HX 2534
Ryzen 7 8845HS 2617
+3.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.77 18.14
Integrated graphics card 5.58 18.32
Recency 4 January 2023 6 December 2023
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 20 16
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 45 Watt

i7-13650HX has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, and 75% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

Ryzen 7 8845HS, on the other hand, has 228.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 months, and 22.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13650HX
Core i7-13650HX
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
Ryzen 7 8845HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 716 votes

Rate Core i7-13650HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 743 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8845HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13650HX or Ryzen 7 8845HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.