Celeron N5105 vs i7-1160G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-1160G7
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.78
+127%
Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
2.55

Core i7-1160G7 outperforms Celeron N5105 by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11331751
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency36.4724.13
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-UP4 (2020)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date2 September 2020 (4 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate2 GT/sno data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1598FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
Identity Protection-+
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Iris® Xe GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz800 MHz
Execution Units9624

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112
OpenGL4.64.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes168
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-1160G7 5.78
+127%
Celeron N5105 2.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-1160G7 9181
+127%
Celeron N5105 4053

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-1160G7 816
+122%
Celeron N5105 368

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-1160G7 201
+85.5%
Celeron N5105 108

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i7-1160G7 4917
+136%
Celeron N5105 2080

Blender(-)

i7-1160G7 911
Celeron N5105 1573
+72.8%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i7-1160G7 1437
+120%
Celeron N5105 653

7-Zip Single

i7-1160G7 4596
+47.9%
Celeron N5105 3108

7-Zip

i7-1160G7 17006
+52.5%
Celeron N5105 11153

WebXPRT 3

i7-1160G7 232
+72.5%
Celeron N5105 134

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.78 2.55
Recency 2 September 2020 11 January 2021
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

i7-1160G7 has a 126.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron N5105, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-1160G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5105 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-1160G7 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5105 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-1160G7 and Celeron N5105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-1160G7
Core i7-1160G7
Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 35 votes

Rate Core i7-1160G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 702 votes

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-1160G7 or Celeron N5105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.