Ryzen 7 7735HS vs Core i7-11600H
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms i7-11600H by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 7 7735HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 690 | 424 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake H45 (2021) | Rembrandt-HS Refresh |
| Release date | 11 May 2021 (3 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $395 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 7 7735HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 4.75 GHz |
| L1 cache | 480 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 7.5 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 18 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 190 mm2 | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 7 7735HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 7 7735HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
| SIPP | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 7 7735HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 7 7735HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 7 7735HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | AMD Radeon 680M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 7 7735HS.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Core i7-11600H by 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Core i7-11600H by 45% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Core i7-11600H by 3% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Core i7-11600H by 41% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.79 | 15.59 |
| Integrated graphics card | 4.72 | 17.38 |
| Recency | 11 May 2021 | 5 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 7 7735HS has a 44.5% higher aggregate performance score, 268.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 7 7735HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-11600H in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 7 7735HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
