i3-1115G4 vs i7-10875H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-10875H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.34
+146%
Core i3-1115G4
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
3.80

Core i7-10875H outperforms Core i3-1115G4 by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8191479
Place by popularitynot in top-10047
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency19.6312.84
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s4 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm SuperFin
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-10875H 9.34
+146%
i3-1115G4 3.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-10875H 14844
+146%
i3-1115G4 6034

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-10875H 1520
i3-1115G4 1567
+3.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-10875H 6567
+115%
i3-1115G4 3059

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-10875H 7803
i3-1115G4 8018
+2.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-10875H 44805
+175%
i3-1115G4 16265

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-10875H 12945
+104%
i3-1115G4 6331

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-10875H 1595
+232%
i3-1115G4 481

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-10875H 202
+6.3%
i3-1115G4 190

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-10875H 10.3
+268%
i3-1115G4 2.8

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i7-10875H 103
+293%
i3-1115G4 26

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i7-10875H 242
+71.2%
i3-1115G4 142

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i7-10875H 7799
+199%
i3-1115G4 2605

Blender(-)

i7-10875H 323
i3-1115G4 1022
+217%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i7-10875H 1300
i3-1115G4 1312
+0.9%

7-Zip Single

i7-10875H 5319
+15.6%
i3-1115G4 4600

7-Zip

i7-10875H 44947
+248%
i3-1115G4 12920

WebXPRT 3

i7-10875H 239
+16.9%
i3-1115G4 205

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.34 3.80
Recency 2 April 2020 2 September 2020
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 28 Watt

i7-10875H has a 145.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

i3-1115G4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 60.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-10875H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-1115G4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-10875H and Core i3-1115G4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-10875H
Core i7-10875H
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Core i3-1115G4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 272 votes

Rate Core i7-10875H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 5421 vote

Rate Core i3-1115G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-10875H or Core i3-1115G4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.