Apple M1 vs i7-10700F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-10700F
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.31
+99.4%

Core i7-10700F outperforms Apple M1 by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-10700F and M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7571206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency7.80no data
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)no data
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-10700F and M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-10700F and M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-10700F and M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-10700F and M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-10700F and M1 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-10700F and M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-10700F and M1.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-10700F 10.31
+99.4%
Apple M1 5.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-10700F 16380
+99.6%
Apple M1 8207

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.31 5.17
Recency 30 April 2020 10 November 2020
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

i7-10700F has a 99.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Apple M1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-10700F is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-10700F is a desktop processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-10700F and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-10700F
Core i7-10700F
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1084 votes

Rate Core i7-10700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2249 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-10700F or M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.