N200 vs i5-L16G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-L16G7
2020
5 cores / 5 threads, 7 Watt
2.14

N200 outperforms Core i5-L16G7 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-L16G7 and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18561597
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Ice Lakeno data
Power efficiency28.8150.73
Architecture codenameLakefield (2020)no data
Release dateJune 2020 (4 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-L16G7 and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores5 (Penta-Core)no data
Threads54
Base clock speed1.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors4,050 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-L16G7 and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFC-CSP1016FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-L16G7 and N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-L16G7 and N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-L16G7 and N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-L16G7 and N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR4X-4267DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidth34 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency500 MHz750 MHz
Execution Units6432

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-L16G7 and N200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-L16G7 and N200 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-L16G7 and N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDX1212.1
OpenGLOpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-L16G7 and N200.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes69
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-L16G7 2.14
N200 3.23
+50.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-L16G7 3386
N200 5106
+50.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.14 3.23
Threads 5 4
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 6 Watt

i5-L16G7 has 25% more threads.

N200, on the other hand, has a 50.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-L16G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-L16G7 and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-L16G7
Core i5-L16G7
Intel N200
N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 23 votes

Rate Core i5-L16G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 33 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-L16G7 or N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.