Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs i5-9500F

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-9500F
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
6.37
+42.2%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.48

Core i5-9500F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9500F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10681337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.11no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency9.106.40
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)30 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$192no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9500F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0PCIe 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3036
L1 cache384 KB384 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB
L3 cache9 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size149 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9500F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9500F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i5-9500F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9500F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9500F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9500F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-9500F 6.37
+42.2%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 4.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-9500F 9923
+42.2%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 6980

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.37 4.48
Recency 23 April 2019 30 September 2019
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

i5-9500F has a 42.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-9500F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9500F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9500F
Core i5-9500F
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 165 votes

Rate Core i5-9500F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 139 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9500F or Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.