Xeon E7-8890 v4 vs i5-9400F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-9400F
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
5.96
+362%
Xeon E7-8890 v4
2016
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
1.29

Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E7-8890 v4 by a whopping 362% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9400F and Xeon E7-8890 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10942269
Place by popularity25not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.070.01
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Xeon E7
Power efficiency8.680.74
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date8 January 2019 (5 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182$7,174

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-9400F has 90600% better value for money than Xeon E7-8890 v4.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9400F and Xeon E7-8890 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0QPI
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s3 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache9 MB (shared)60 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C79 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9400F and Xeon E7-8890 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E7-8890 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Core i5-9400F and Xeon E7-8890 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E7-8890 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E7-8890 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size128 GB3 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s85 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E7-8890 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1632

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-9400F 5.96
+362%
Xeon E7-8890 v4 1.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-9400F 9470
+361%
Xeon E7-8890 v4 2054

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.96 1.29
Recency 8 January 2019 20 June 2016
Physical cores 6 24
Threads 6 48
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

i5-9400F has a 362% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-8890 v4, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i5-9400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7-8890 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-9400F is a desktop processor while Xeon E7-8890 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9400F and Xeon E7-8890 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F
Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4
Xeon E7-8890 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 56646 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 28 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8890 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9400F or Xeon E7-8890 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.