Xeon E3-1270 v6 vs i5-9400F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-9400F
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
5.96
+6%
Xeon E3-1270 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 72 Watt
5.62

Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v6 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10961138
Place by popularity25not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.175.91
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Xeon E3
Power efficiency8.687.39
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date8 January 2019 (5 years ago)28 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182$328

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-9400F has 55% better value for money than Xeon E3-1270 v6.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier2938
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache9 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt72 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no dataN/A
Max resolution over eDPno dataN/A
Max resolution over DisplayPortno dataN/A
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-9400F 5.96
+6%
Xeon E3-1270 v6 5.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-9400F 9470
+6%
Xeon E3-1270 v6 8932

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-9400F 1403
Xeon E3-1270 v6 1417
+1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-9400F 4898
+8.5%
Xeon E3-1270 v6 4514

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.96 5.62
Recency 8 January 2019 28 March 2017
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 72 Watt

i5-9400F has a 6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores, and 10.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon E3-1270 v6, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6.

Note that Core i5-9400F is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1270 v6 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9400F and Xeon E3-1270 v6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6
Xeon E3-1270 v6

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 56662 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 45 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9400F or Xeon E3-1270 v6, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.