Celeron G1610 vs i5-8400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-8400
2017
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
5.81
+505%
Celeron G1610
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
0.96

Core i5-8400 outperforms Celeron G1610 by a whopping 505% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11292503
Place by popularity63not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.900.03
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency8.461.65
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S (2017−2018)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date5 October 2017 (7 years ago)3 December 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182$388

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-8400 has 16233% better value for money than Celeron G1610.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache9 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size149 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+-
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-8400 5.81
+505%
Celeron G1610 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-8400 9235
+504%
Celeron G1610 1530

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-8400 1373
+232%
Celeron G1610 414

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-8400 4809
+597%
Celeron G1610 690

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.81 0.96
Integrated graphics card 3.09 0.77
Recency 5 October 2017 3 December 2012
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

i5-8400 has a 505.2% higher aggregate performance score, 301.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron G1610, on the other hand, has 18.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-8400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1610 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-8400 and Celeron G1610, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-8400
Core i5-8400
Intel Celeron G1610
Celeron G1610

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2737 votes

Rate Core i5-8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 236 votes

Rate Celeron G1610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-8400 or Celeron G1610, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.