Core i5-7500 vs Core i5-8350U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-8350U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.01

i5-7500 outperforms i5-8350U by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-8350U and Core i5-7500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13591336
Place by popularitynot in top-10075
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.57
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i5
Architecture codenameKaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date21 August 2017 (6 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$297$202

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-8350U and Core i5-7500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache6 MB6 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size123 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-8350U and Core i5-7500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1356FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-8350U and Core i5-7500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSXno data+
SIPPno data+

Security technologies

Core i5-8350U and Core i5-7500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-8350U and Core i5-7500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-8350U and Core i5-7500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 620Intel HD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-8350U and Core i5-7500.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-8350U 4.01
i5-7500 4.11
+2.5%

Core i5-7500 outperforms Core i5-8350U by 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-8350U 6195
i5-7500 6362
+2.7%

Core i5-7500 outperforms Core i5-8350U by 3% in Passmark.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-8350U 5925
i5-7500 7247
+22.3%

Core i5-7500 outperforms Core i5-8350U by 22% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i5-8350U 9.7
+0.2%
i5-7500 9.72

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i5-8350U 6
i5-7500 7
+15.8%

Core i5-7500 outperforms Core i5-8350U by 16% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-8350U 569
i5-7500 585
+2.8%

Core i5-7500 outperforms Core i5-8350U by 3% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-8350U 151
i5-7500 159
+5.6%

Core i5-7500 outperforms Core i5-8350U by 6% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-8350U 1.69
i5-7500 1.83
+8.3%

Core i5-7500 outperforms Core i5-8350U by 8% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-8350U 4.1
+26.6%
i5-7500 3.2

Core i5-8350U outperforms Core i5-7500 by 27% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-8350U 2961
i5-7500 2979
+0.6%

Core i5-7500 outperforms Core i5-8350U by 1% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-8350U 37
i5-7500 39
+5.9%

Core i5-7500 outperforms Core i5-8350U by 6% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-8350U 153
i5-7500 182
+18.8%

Core i5-7500 outperforms Core i5-8350U by 19% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.01 4.11
Integrated graphics card 2.67 3.10
Recency 21 August 2017 3 January 2017
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

i5-8350U has an age advantage of 7 months, 100% more threads, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

i5-7500, on the other hand, has a 2.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 16.1% faster integrated GPU.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-8350U and Core i5-7500.

Be aware that Core i5-8350U is a notebook processor while Core i5-7500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-8350U and Core i5-7500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-8350U
Core i5-8350U
Intel Core i5-7500
Core i5-7500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 526 votes

Rate Core i5-8350U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1662 votes

Rate Core i5-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-8350U or Core i5-7500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.