Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs i5-7640X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-7640X
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 112 Watt
4.43
+5.5%
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.20

Core i5-7640X outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1605B by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-7640X and Ryzen Embedded V1605B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13391389
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.95no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency3.7426.50
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-X (2017)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date26 June 2017 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$242no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-7640X and Ryzen Embedded V1605B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier4020
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data210 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-7640X and Ryzen Embedded V1605B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066FP5
Power consumption (TDP)112 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-7640X and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-7640X and Ryzen Embedded V1605B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-7640X and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardHD 630AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-7640X and Ryzen Embedded V1605B.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-7640X 4.43
+5.5%
Ryzen Embedded V1605B 4.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-7640X 7036
+5.4%
Ryzen Embedded V1605B 6677

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.43 4.20
Recency 26 June 2017 21 February 2018
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 112 Watt 15 Watt

i5-7640X has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, 100% more threads, and 646.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-7640X and Ryzen Embedded V1605B.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-7640X and Ryzen Embedded V1605B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-7640X
Core i5-7640X
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 38 votes

Rate Core i5-7640X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 21 vote

Rate Ryzen Embedded V1605B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-7640X or Ryzen Embedded V1605B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.