FX-4150 vs i5-760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-760
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.66
FX-4150
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.10
+26.5%

FX-4150 outperforms Core i5-760 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-760 and FX-4150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20661872
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.652.08
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date18 July 2010 (14 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$230no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-760 and FX-4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size296 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-760 and FX-4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-760 and FX-4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i5-760 and FX-4150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-760 and FX-4150 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-760 and FX-4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-760 and FX-4150.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-760 1.66
FX-4150 2.10
+26.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-760 2633
FX-4150 3327
+26.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 2.10
Recency 18 July 2010 23 October 2012
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm

FX-4150 has a 26.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-760 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-760 and FX-4150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-760
Core i5-760
AMD FX-4150
FX-4150

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 752 votes

Rate Core i5-760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate FX-4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-760 or FX-4150, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.