EPYC 7502P vs i5-661

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-661
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 87 Watt
1.55
EPYC 7502P
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
31.99
+1964%

EPYC 7502P outperforms Core i5-661 by a whopping 1964% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-661 and EPYC 7502P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2110127
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.089.15
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.6916.82
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$252$2,300

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7502P has 11338% better value for money than i5-661.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-661 and EPYC 7502P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed3.33 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size81 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-661 and EPYC 7502P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156TR4
Power consumption (TDP)87 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-661 and EPYC 7502P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-661 and EPYC 7502P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-661 and EPYC 7502P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-661 and EPYC 7502P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size16.38 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-661 and EPYC 7502P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-661 and EPYC 7502P.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-661 1.55
EPYC 7502P 31.99
+1964%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-661 2470
EPYC 7502P 50818
+1957%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-661 483
EPYC 7502P 963
+99.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-661 953
EPYC 7502P 7822
+721%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 31.99
Recency 7 January 2010 7 August 2019
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 87 Watt 180 Watt

i5-661 has 106.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7502P, on the other hand, has a 1963.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7502P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-661 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-661 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7502P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-661 and EPYC 7502P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-661
Core i5-661
AMD EPYC 7502P
EPYC 7502P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 195 votes

Rate Core i5-661 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7502P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-661 or EPYC 7502P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.