i5-13490F vs i5-661

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-661
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 87 Watt
1.55
Core i5-13490F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
17.36
+1020%

Core i5-13490F outperforms Core i5-661 by a whopping 1020% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-661 and Core i5-13490F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2110360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0851.85
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.6925.28
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)10 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$252$235

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13490F has 64713% better value for money than i5-661.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-661 and Core i5-13490F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3.33 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size81 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-661 and Core i5-13490F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA11561700
Power consumption (TDP)87 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-661 and Core i5-13490F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-661 and Core i5-13490F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-661 and Core i5-13490F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-661 and Core i5-13490F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-661 and Core i5-13490F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-661 and Core i5-13490F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-661 1.55
i5-13490F 17.36
+1020%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-661 2470
i5-13490F 27574
+1016%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 17.36
Recency 7 January 2010 10 February 2023
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 87 Watt 65 Watt

i5-13490F has a 1020% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 400% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 33.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13490F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-661 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-661 and Core i5-13490F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-661
Core i5-661
Intel Core i5-13490F
Core i5-13490F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 195 votes

Rate Core i5-661 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 163 votes

Rate Core i5-13490F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-661 or Core i5-13490F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.