Xeon E5-2603 v2 vs Core i5-6600K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-6600K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 91 Watt
4.09
+131%

i5-6600K outperforms Xeon E5-2603 v2 by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-6600K and Xeon E5-2603 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13441937
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.770.43
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5 (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Release date5 August 2015 (8 years ago)1 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$242$240
Current price$267 (1.1x MSRP)$149 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-6600K has 79% better value for money than Xeon E5-2603 v2.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-6600K and Xeon E5-2603 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB10 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size122 mm2160 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6600K and Xeon E5-2603 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA11512011
Power consumption (TDP)91 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6600K and Xeon E5-2603 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-6600K and Xeon E5-2603 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6600K and Xeon E5-2603 v2 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6600K and Xeon E5-2603 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s42.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6600K and Xeon E5-2603 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-6600K 4.09
+131%
Xeon E5-2603 v2 1.77

Core i5-6600K outperforms Xeon E5-2603 v2 by 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-6600K 6322
+131%
Xeon E5-2603 v2 2735

Core i5-6600K outperforms Xeon E5-2603 v2 by 131% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.09 1.77
Recency 5 August 2015 1 September 2013
Cost $242 $240
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 91 Watt 80 Watt

i5-6600K has a 131.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2603 v2, on the other hand, has its recommended price lower by $2, and 13.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-6600K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2603 v2 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-6600K is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2603 v2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6600K and Xeon E5-2603 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-6600K
Core i5-6600K
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v2
Xeon E5-2603 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1069 votes

Rate Core i5-6600K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2603 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-6600K or Xeon E5-2603 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.