i7-12700F vs i5-6440EQ

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-6440EQ
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
3.35
Core i7-12700F
2022
12 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
19.32
+477%

Core i7-12700F outperforms Core i5-6440EQ by a whopping 477% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-6440EQ and Core i7-12700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1579302
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.5638.44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency7.0127.98
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date12 October 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250$386

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-12700F has 6764% better value for money than i5-6440EQ.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-6440EQ and Core i7-12700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache256 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size122 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6440EQ and Core i7-12700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6440EQ and Core i7-12700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i5-6440EQ and Core i7-12700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6440EQ and Core i7-12700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6440EQ and Core i7-12700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6440EQ and Core i7-12700F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-6440EQ 3.35
i7-12700F 19.32
+477%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-6440EQ 5324
i7-12700F 30688
+476%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.35 19.32
Recency 12 October 2015 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 20
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

i5-6440EQ has 44.4% lower power consumption.

i7-12700F, on the other hand, has a 476.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 200% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

The Core i7-12700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-6440EQ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-6440EQ is a notebook processor while Core i7-12700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6440EQ and Core i7-12700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-6440EQ
Core i5-6440EQ
Intel Core i7-12700F
Core i7-12700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i5-6440EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1438 votes

Rate Core i7-12700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-6440EQ or Core i7-12700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.