Celeron 2970M vs i5-460M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-460M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.85
Celeron 2970M
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 37 Watt
0.98
+15.3%

Celeron 2970M outperforms Core i5-460M by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-460M and Celeron 2970M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25822499
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency2.212.42
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)14 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$75

Detailed specifications

Core i5-460M and Celeron 2970M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size81+114 mm2130 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million960 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-460M and Celeron 2970M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288,PGA988FCPGA946
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-460M and Celeron 2970M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-460M and Celeron 2970M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-460M and Celeron 2970M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-460M and Celeron 2970M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHz1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-460M and Celeron 2970M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
VGAno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-460M and Celeron 2970M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-460M 0.85
Celeron 2970M 0.98
+15.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-460M 1296
Celeron 2970M 1501
+15.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-460M 3080
Celeron 2970M 3222
+4.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-460M 7085
+13.4%
Celeron 2970M 6248

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-460M 2945
+18.3%
Celeron 2970M 2489

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-460M 18.6
+80.1%
Celeron 2970M 33.5

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-460M 2
+21.3%
Celeron 2970M 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 0.98
Recency 26 September 2010 14 April 2014
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 37 Watt

i5-460M has 100% more threads, and 5.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron 2970M, on the other hand, has a 15.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron 2970M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-460M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-460M and Celeron 2970M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-460M
Core i5-460M
Intel Celeron 2970M
Celeron 2970M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 231 vote

Rate Core i5-460M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 2970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-460M or Celeron 2970M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.