Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 vs i5-4300U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-4300U
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.57
+241%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46

Core i5-4300U outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 by a whopping 241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21132934
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i52x AMD Turion Ultra
Power efficiency9.851.24
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Puma (2008−2009)
Release date1 October 2013 (11 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Smart Response+no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4400no data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43280x2000@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3200x2000@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports4no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports4no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-4300U 1.57
+241%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 0.46

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-4300U 4070
+129%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 1777

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-4300U 8601
+150%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 3441

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-4300U 3242
+110%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 1546

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.57 0.46
Recency 1 October 2013 3 June 2008
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

i5-4300U has a 241.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-4300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4300U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-4300U
Core i5-4300U
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 195 votes

Rate Core i5-4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 24 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-4300U or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.