Xeon E5603 vs i5-3570

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3570
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 77 Watt
3.16
+155%
Xeon E5603
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.24

Core i5-3570 outperforms Xeon E5603 by a whopping 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3570 and Xeon E5603 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16162322
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.440.13
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.811.44
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$231$286

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-3570 has 238% better value for money than Xeon E5603.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3570 and Xeon E5603 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size133 mm2239 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3570 and Xeon E5603 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon E5603. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-3570 and Xeon E5603 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon E5603 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon E5603. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB288 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3570 and Xeon E5603 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon E5603.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3570 3.16
+155%
Xeon E5603 1.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3570 4932
+155%
Xeon E5603 1935

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.16 1.24
Recency 1 June 2012 14 February 2011
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 80 Watt

i5-3570 has a 154.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 3.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5603 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-3570 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5603 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3570 and Xeon E5603, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3570
Core i5-3570
Intel Xeon E5603
Xeon E5603

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3244 votes

Rate Core i5-3570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3570 or Xeon E5603, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.