Xeon D-1702 vs i5-3365M
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-3365M and Xeon D-1702 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | no data |
| Release date | 1 November 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-3365M and Xeon D-1702 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 160 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-3365M and Xeon D-1702 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | FCBGA2227 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3365M and Xeon D-1702. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-3365M and Xeon D-1702 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3365M and Xeon D-1702 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3365M and Xeon D-1702. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown Dual-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4000 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3365M and Xeon D-1702.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 November 2012 | 1 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Xeon D-1702 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-3365M and Xeon D-1702. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i5-3365M is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1702 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3365M and Xeon D-1702, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
