Xeon E7-8867 v4 vs i5-3317U

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3317U and Xeon E7-8867 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2281	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Core i5	no data
Power efficiency	7.08	no data
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	no data
Release date	1 June 2012 (12 years ago)	1 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$225	no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3317U and Xeon E7-8867 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads	4	36
Base clock speed	1.7 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.6 GHz	3.3 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	9.6 GT/s
L1 cache	64K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	256K (per core)	no data
L3 cache	3 MB (shared)	45 MB
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Die size	118 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	80 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3317U and Xeon E7-8867 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	8
Socket	FCBGA1023	FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3317U and Xeon E7-8867 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX	Intel® AVX2
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	+	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	no data	46 Bit
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i5-3317U and Xeon E7-8867 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	+
Identity Protection	+	-
OS Guard	no data	+
Anti-Theft	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3317U and Xeon E7-8867 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3317U and Xeon E7-8867 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600	DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size	32 GB	3 TB
Max memory channels	2	4
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	85 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics 4000	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	1.05 GHz	no data
InTru 3D	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3317U and Xeon E7-8867 v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
SDVO	+	no data
CRT	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3317U and Xeon E7-8867 v4.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	16	32

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 June 2012	1 April 2016
Physical cores	2	18
Threads	4	36
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	165 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3317U and Xeon E7-8867 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---