A6-7480 vs i5-3210M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3210M
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.55
+33.6%
A6-7480
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 45 Watt
1.16

Core i5-3210M outperforms A6-7480 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3210M and A6-7480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21152369
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency4.192.44
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)26 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3210M and A6-7480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)160K
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size118 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3210M and A6-7480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3210M and A6-7480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-3210M and A6-7480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3210M and A6-7480 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3210M and A6-7480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000Radeon R5
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3210M and A6-7480 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3210M and A6-7480.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3210M 1.55
+33.6%
A6-7480 1.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3210M 2464
+34.1%
A6-7480 1837

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 1.16
Recency 1 June 2012 26 October 2018
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

i5-3210M has a 33.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

A6-7480, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years.

The Core i5-3210M is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-7480 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-3210M is a notebook processor while A6-7480 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3210M and A6-7480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3210M
Core i5-3210M
AMD A6-7480
A6-7480

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2671 vote

Rate Core i5-3210M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 157 votes

Rate A6-7480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3210M or A6-7480, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.