EPYC 74F3 vs i5-2500S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2500S
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.13
EPYC 74F3
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
38.19
+1693%

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Core i5-2500S by a whopping 1693% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2500S and EPYC 74F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking187277
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.8711.20
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency3.1015.07
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$2,900

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 74F3 has 130% better value for money than i5-2500S.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2500S and EPYC 74F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache6144 KB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size216 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2500S and EPYC 74F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA1155SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2500S and EPYC 74F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-2500S and EPYC 74F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2500S and EPYC 74F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2500S and EPYC 74F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2000N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2500S and EPYC 74F3 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2500S and EPYC 74F3.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2500S 2.13
EPYC 74F3 38.19
+1693%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2500S 3380
EPYC 74F3 60666
+1695%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-2500S 576
EPYC 74F3 1438
+150%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-2500S 1493
EPYC 74F3 12689
+750%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 38.19
Recency 9 January 2011 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 240 Watt

i5-2500S has 269.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 74F3, on the other hand, has a 1693% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 74F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-2500S in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-2500S is a desktop processor while EPYC 74F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2500S and EPYC 74F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2500S
Core i5-2500S
AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 102 votes

Rate Core i5-2500S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2500S or EPYC 74F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.