Xeon L3360 vs i5-2500K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2500K
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.60
+71.1%

Core i5-2500K outperforms Xeon L3360 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2500K and Xeon L3360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17182130
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.31no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i5 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency2.592.21
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$216no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2500K and Xeon L3360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.83 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache6 MB (shared)12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C76 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2500K and Xeon L3360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA1155LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2500K and Xeon L3360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-2500K and Xeon L3360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2500K and Xeon L3360 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2500K and Xeon L3360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2500K and Xeon L3360 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2500K and Xeon L3360.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2500K 2.60
+71.1%
Xeon L3360 1.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2500K 4123
+70.9%
Xeon L3360 2412

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 1.52
Recency 9 January 2011 1 January 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

i5-2500K has a 71.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon L3360, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-2500K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L3360 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-2500K is a desktop processor while Xeon L3360 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2500K and Xeon L3360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2500K
Core i5-2500K
Intel Xeon L3360
Xeon L3360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1788 votes

Rate Core i5-2500K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon L3360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2500K or Xeon L3360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.