A6-8500P vs i5-2450M
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-2450M outperforms A6-8500P by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-2450M and A6-8500P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2262 | 2525 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i5 | AMD Carrizo |
Power efficiency | 3.54 | 5.74 |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
Release date | 1 January 2012 (12 years ago) | 3 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $823 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-2450M and A6-8500P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 25 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1024 KB |
L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 149 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 90 °C |
Number of transistors | 624 million | 3100 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-2450M and A6-8500P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | FCBGA1023,PPGA988 | FP4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2450M and A6-8500P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | HSA 1.0 |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | FMA4 |
AVX | + | AVX |
FRTC | - | + |
FreeSync | - | + |
TrueAudio | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
Out-of-band client management | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
HSA | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
My WiFi | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-2450M and A6-8500P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2450M and A6-8500P are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2450M and A6-8500P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | Not Listed |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
iGPU core count | no data | 4 |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics max frequency | 1.3 GHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2450M and A6-8500P integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | + |
HDMI | + | + |
SDVO | + | no data |
CRT | + | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i5-2450M and A6-8500P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2450M and A6-8500P.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.31 | 0.91 |
Recency | 1 January 2012 | 3 June 2015 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
i5-2450M has a 44% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.
A6-8500P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-2450M is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-8500P in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2450M and A6-8500P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.