Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs Core i5-2380P

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2380P
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.40
+248%
Core 2 Extreme X6800
2 cores / 2 threads, 75 Watt
0.69

Core i5-2380P outperforms Core 2 Extreme X6800 by a whopping 248% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2380P and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17702710
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.69no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)
Power efficiency2.380.87
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Conroe (2006−2007)
Release dateJanuary 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$180no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2380P and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.93 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s1066 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache6144 KB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors1160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2380P and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155,LGA1155no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt75 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2380P and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-2380P and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2380P and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2380P and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Quick Sync Video+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2380P and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2380P 2.40
+248%
Core 2 Extreme X6800 0.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2380P 3797
+247%
Core 2 Extreme X6800 1095

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.40 0.69
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 75 Watt

i5-2380P has a 247.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Extreme X6800, on the other hand, has 26.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-2380P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X6800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2380P and Core 2 Extreme X6800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2380P
Core i5-2380P
Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800
Core 2 Extreme X6800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 18 votes

Rate Core i5-2380P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 18 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2380P or Core 2 Extreme X6800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.