EPYC 9654P vs i5-13500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13500
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
20.01
EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
72.13
+260%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Core i5-13500 by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13500 and EPYC 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2837
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.272.01
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency29.1318.96
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$242$10,625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13500 has 3098% better value for money than EPYC 9654P.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13500 and EPYC 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)96
Threads20192
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate154 MHzno data
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache80K (per core)6 MB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)96 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size257 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13500 and EPYC 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket1700SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13500 and EPYC 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-13500 and EPYC 9654P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13500 and EPYC 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13500 and EPYC 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13500 and EPYC 9654P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13500 20.01
EPYC 9654P 72.13
+260%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13500 31780
EPYC 9654P 114570
+261%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.01 72.13
Recency 4 January 2023 10 November 2022
Physical cores 14 96
Threads 20 192
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

i5-13500 has an age advantage of 1 month, and 453.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654P, on the other hand, has a 260.5% higher aggregate performance score, 585.7% more physical cores and 860% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-13500 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13500 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13500 and EPYC 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13500
Core i5-13500
AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1289 votes

Rate Core i5-13500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13500 or EPYC 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.