Celeron B800 vs i5-13500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13500
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
20.02
+4667%
Celeron B800
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42

Core i5-13500 outperforms Celeron B800 by a whopping 4667% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13500 and Celeron B800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2832990
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.31no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency29.131.13
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)19 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$242$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13500 and Celeron B800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads202
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate154 MHz4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache80K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm32 nm
Die size257 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13500 and Celeron B800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket1700G2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13500 and Celeron B800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Core i5-13500 and Celeron B800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13500 and Celeron B800 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13500 and Celeron B800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 770Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13500 and Celeron B800.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13500 20.02
+4667%
Celeron B800 0.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13500 31794
+4695%
Celeron B800 663

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13500 2427
+883%
Celeron B800 247

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13500 12292
+2855%
Celeron B800 416

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-13500 8875
+365%
Celeron B800 1910

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-13500 49300
+1205%
Celeron B800 3779

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-13500 14875
+870%
Celeron B800 1534

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-13500 4.02
+1069%
Celeron B800 47

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.02 0.42
Integrated graphics card 6.16 0.34
Recency 4 January 2023 19 June 2011
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 20 2
Chip lithography 10 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

i5-13500 has a 4666.7% higher aggregate performance score, 1711.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 600% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron B800, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B800 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13500 is a desktop processor while Celeron B800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13500 and Celeron B800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13500
Core i5-13500
Intel Celeron B800
Celeron B800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1289 votes

Rate Core i5-13500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 193 votes

Rate Celeron B800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13500 or Celeron B800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.