i5-13400F vs i5-1345U
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i5-1345U by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-1345U and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 812 | 432 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 46 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 58.38 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Raptor Lake-U | no data |
| Power efficiency | 59.43 | 23.05 |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $309 | $196 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-1345U and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-1345U and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-1345U and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-1345U and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-1345U and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-1345U and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5, DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1250 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-1345U and Core i5-13400F.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
Blender(-)
Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core
7-Zip Single
7-Zip
WebXPRT 3
CrossMark Overall
WebXPRT 4 Overall
Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.42 | 15.83 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
i5-1345U has 333.3% lower power consumption.
i5-13400F, on the other hand, has a 68% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more threads.
The Core i5-13400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-1345U in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i5-1345U is a notebook processor while Core i5-13400F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-1345U and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
