Xeon E-2478 vs i5-13400F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.84
Xeon E-2478
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
18.78
+18.6%

Xeon E-2478 outperforms Core i5-13400F by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2478 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking420314
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.2082.64
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency23.0622.22
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$196$568

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2478 has 50% better value for money than i5-13400F.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2478 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2478 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2478. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2478 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2478 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2478. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5, DDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size192 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2478.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400F 15.84
Xeon E-2478 18.78
+18.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400F 25168
Xeon E-2478 29827
+18.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.84 18.78
Recency 4 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 10 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 80 Watt

i5-13400F has 25% more physical cores, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2478, on the other hand, has a 18.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

The Xeon E-2478 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-13400F in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13400F is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2478 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2478, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
Intel Xeon E-2478
Xeon E-2478

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3165 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2478 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400F or Xeon E-2478, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.