Core i9-14900K vs Core i5-13400E
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-13400E and Core i9-14900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 67 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 64.28 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S | Raptor Lake |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 17 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $589 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-13400E and Core i9-14900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 32 MB |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-13400E and Core i9-14900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | LGA 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400E and Core i9-14900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-13400E and Core i9-14900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400E and Core i9-14900K are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400E and Core i9-14900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400E and Core i9-14900K.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 17 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 24 |
| Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
i5-13400E has 92.3% lower power consumption.
i9-14900K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 140% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-13400E and Core i9-14900K. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400E and Core i9-14900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
