Xeon X5680 vs i5-13400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.66
+240%
Xeon X5680
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.31

Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon X5680 by a whopping 240% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4861367
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.984.41
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency21.343.14
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221$172

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400 has 965% better value for money than Xeon X5680.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores4no data
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.33 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm32 nm
Die size257 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C79 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR3
Maximum memory size192 GB288 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 730no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHzno data
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400 14.66
+240%
Xeon X5680 4.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23289
+240%
Xeon X5680 6842

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13400 2298
+334%
Xeon X5680 529

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13400 10205
+309%
Xeon X5680 2496

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.66 4.31
Recency 4 January 2023 14 February 2010
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

i5-13400 has a 240.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 66.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5680 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13400 is a desktop processor while Xeon X5680 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Xeon X5680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
Intel Xeon X5680
Xeon X5680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1095 votes

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 339 votes

Rate Xeon X5680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Xeon X5680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.